haxorqt
Home
Console
Upload
information
Create File
Create Folder
About
:
/
opt
/
alt
/
python37
/
share
/
doc
/
alt-python37-alembic
/
docs
/
_sources
/
Filename :
branches.txt
back
Copy
f.. _branches: Working with Branches ===================== .. note:: Alembic 0.7.0 features an all-new versioning model that fully supports branch points, merge points, and long-lived, labeled branches, including independent branches originating from multiple bases. A great emphasis has been placed on there being almost no impact on the existing Alembic workflow, including that all commands work pretty much the same as they did before, the format of migration files doesn't require any change (though there are some changes that are recommended), and even the structure of the ``alembic_version`` table does not change at all. However, most alembic commands now offer new features which will break out an Alembic environment into "branch mode", where things become a lot more intricate. Working in "branch mode" should be considered as a "beta" feature, with many new paradigms and use cases still to be stress tested in the wild. Please tread lightly! .. versionadded:: 0.7.0 A **branch** describes a point in a migration stream when two or more versions refer to the same parent migration as their anscestor. Branches occur naturally when two divergent source trees, both containing Alembic revision files created independently within those source trees, are merged together into one. When this occurs, the challenge of a branch is to **merge** the branches into a single series of changes, so that databases established from either source tree individually can be upgraded to reference the merged result equally. Another scenario where branches are present are when we create them directly; either at some point in the migration stream we'd like different series of migrations to be managed independently (e.g. we create a tree), or we'd like separate migration streams for different features starting at the root (e.g. a *forest*). We'll illustrate all of these cases, starting with the most common which is a source-merge-originated branch that we'll merge. Starting with the "account table" example we began in :ref:`create_migration`, assume we have our basemost version ``1975ea83b712``, which leads into the second revision ``ae1027a6acf``, and the migration files for these two revisions are checked into our source repository. Consider if we merged into our source repository another code branch which contained a revision for another table called ``shopping_cart``. This revision was made against our first Alembic revision, the one that generated ``account``. After loading the second source tree in, a new file ``27c6a30d7c24_add_shopping_cart_table.py`` exists within our ``versions`` directory. Both it, as well as ``ae1027a6acf_add_a_column.py``, reference ``1975ea83b712_add_account_table.py`` as the "downgrade" revision. To illustrate:: # main source tree: 1975ea83b712 (create account table) -> ae1027a6acf (add a column) # branched source tree 1975ea83b712 (create account table) -> 27c6a30d7c24 (add shopping cart table) Above, we can see ``1975ea83b712`` is our **branch point**; two distinct versions both refer to it as its parent. The Alembic command ``branches`` illustrates this fact:: $ alembic branches --verbose Rev: 1975ea83b712 (branchpoint) Parent: <base> Branches into: 27c6a30d7c24, ae1027a6acf Path: foo/versions/1975ea83b712_add_account_table.py create account table Revision ID: 1975ea83b712 Revises: Create Date: 2014-11-20 13:02:46.257104 -> 27c6a30d7c24 (head), add shopping cart table -> ae1027a6acf (head), add a column History shows it too, illustrating two ``head`` entries as well as a ``branchpoint``:: $ alembic history 1975ea83b712 -> 27c6a30d7c24 (head), add shopping cart table 1975ea83b712 -> ae1027a6acf (head), add a column <base> -> 1975ea83b712 (branchpoint), create account table We can get a view of just the current heads using ``alembic heads``:: $ alembic heads --verbose Rev: 27c6a30d7c24 (head) Parent: 1975ea83b712 Path: foo/versions/27c6a30d7c24_add_shopping_cart_table.py add shopping cart table Revision ID: 27c6a30d7c24 Revises: 1975ea83b712 Create Date: 2014-11-20 13:03:11.436407 Rev: ae1027a6acf (head) Parent: 1975ea83b712 Path: foo/versions/ae1027a6acf_add_a_column.py add a column Revision ID: ae1027a6acf Revises: 1975ea83b712 Create Date: 2014-11-20 13:02:54.849677 If we try to run an ``upgrade`` to the usual end target of ``head``, Alembic no longer considers this to be an unambiguous command. As we have more than one ``head``, the ``upgrade`` command wants us to provide more information:: $ alembic upgrade head FAILED: Multiple head revisions are present for given argument 'head'; please specify a specific target revision, '<branchname>@head' to narrow to a specific head, or 'heads' for all heads The ``upgrade`` command gives us quite a few options in which we can proceed with our upgrade, either giving it information on *which* head we'd like to upgrade towards, or alternatively stating that we'd like *all* heads to be upgraded towards at once. However, in the typical case of two source trees being merged, we will want to pursue a third option, which is that we can **merge** these branches. Merging Branches ---------------- An Alembic merge is a migration file that joins two or more "head" files together. If the two branches we have right now can be said to be a "tree" structure, introducing this merge file will turn it into a "diamond" structure:: -- ae1027a6acf --> / \ <base> --> 1975ea83b712 --> --> mergepoint \ / -- 27c6a30d7c24 --> We create the merge file using ``alembic merge``; with this command, we can pass to it an argument such as ``heads``, meaning we'd like to merge all heads. Or, we can pass it individual revision numbers sequentally:: $ alembic merge -m "merge ae1 and 27c" ae1027 27c6a Generating /path/to/foo/versions/53fffde5ad5_merge_ae1_and_27c.py ... done Looking inside the new file, we see it as a regular migration file, with the only new twist is that ``down_revision`` points to both revisions:: """merge ae1 and 27c Revision ID: 53fffde5ad5 Revises: ae1027a6acf, 27c6a30d7c24 Create Date: 2014-11-20 13:31:50.811663 """ # revision identifiers, used by Alembic. revision = '53fffde5ad5' down_revision = ('ae1027a6acf', '27c6a30d7c24') branch_labels = None from alembic import op import sqlalchemy as sa def upgrade(): pass def downgrade(): pass This file is a regular migration file, and if we wish to, we may place :class:`.Operations` directives into the ``upgrade()`` and ``downgrade()`` functions like any other migration file. Though it is probably best to limit the instructions placed here only to those that deal with any kind of reconciliation that is needed between the two merged branches, if any. The ``heads`` command now illustrates that the multiple heads in our ``versions/`` directory have been resolved into our new head:: $ alembic heads --verbose Rev: 53fffde5ad5 (head) (mergepoint) Merges: ae1027a6acf, 27c6a30d7c24 Path: foo/versions/53fffde5ad5_merge_ae1_and_27c.py merge ae1 and 27c Revision ID: 53fffde5ad5 Revises: ae1027a6acf, 27c6a30d7c24 Create Date: 2014-11-20 13:31:50.811663 History shows a similar result, as the mergepoint becomes our head:: $ alembic history ae1027a6acf, 27c6a30d7c24 -> 53fffde5ad5 (head) (mergepoint), merge ae1 and 27c 1975ea83b712 -> ae1027a6acf, add a column 1975ea83b712 -> 27c6a30d7c24, add shopping cart table <base> -> 1975ea83b712 (branchpoint), create account table With a single ``head`` target, a generic ``upgrade`` can proceed:: $ alembic upgrade head INFO [alembic.migration] Context impl PostgresqlImpl. INFO [alembic.migration] Will assume transactional DDL. INFO [alembic.migration] Running upgrade -> 1975ea83b712, create account table INFO [alembic.migration] Running upgrade 1975ea83b712 -> 27c6a30d7c24, add shopping cart table INFO [alembic.migration] Running upgrade 1975ea83b712 -> ae1027a6acf, add a column INFO [alembic.migration] Running upgrade ae1027a6acf, 27c6a30d7c24 -> 53fffde5ad5, merge ae1 and 27c .. topic:: merge mechanics The upgrade process traverses through all of our migration files using a **topological sorting** algorithm, treating the list of migration files not as a linked list, but as a **directed acyclic graph**. The starting points of this traversal are the **current heads** within our database, and the end point is the "head" revision or revisions specified. When a migration proceeds across a point at which there are multiple heads, the ``alembic_version`` table will at that point store *multiple* rows, one for each head. Our migration process above will emit SQL against ``alembic_version`` along these lines: .. sourcecode:: sql -- Running upgrade -> 1975ea83b712, create account table INSERT INTO alembic_version (version_num) VALUES ('1975ea83b712') -- Running upgrade 1975ea83b712 -> 27c6a30d7c24, add shopping cart table UPDATE alembic_version SET version_num='27c6a30d7c24' WHERE alembic_version.version_num = '1975ea83b712' -- Running upgrade 1975ea83b712 -> ae1027a6acf, add a column INSERT INTO alembic_version (version_num) VALUES ('ae1027a6acf') -- Running upgrade ae1027a6acf, 27c6a30d7c24 -> 53fffde5ad5, merge ae1 and 27c DELETE FROM alembic_version WHERE alembic_version.version_num = 'ae1027a6acf' UPDATE alembic_version SET version_num='53fffde5ad5' WHERE alembic_version.version_num = '27c6a30d7c24' At the point at which both ``27c6a30d7c24`` and ``ae1027a6acf`` exist within our database, both values are present in ``alembic_version``, which now has two rows. If we upgrade to these two versions alone, then stop and run ``alembic current``, we will see this:: $ alembic current --verbose Current revision(s) for postgresql://scott:XXXXX@localhost/test: Rev: ae1027a6acf Parent: 1975ea83b712 Path: foo/versions/ae1027a6acf_add_a_column.py add a column Revision ID: ae1027a6acf Revises: 1975ea83b712 Create Date: 2014-11-20 13:02:54.849677 Rev: 27c6a30d7c24 Parent: 1975ea83b712 Path: foo/versions/27c6a30d7c24_add_shopping_cart_table.py add shopping cart table Revision ID: 27c6a30d7c24 Revises: 1975ea83b712 Create Date: 2014-11-20 13:03:11.436407 A key advantage to the ``merge`` process is that it will run equally well on databases that were present on version ``ae1027a6acf`` alone, versus databases that were present on version ``27c6a30d7c24`` alone; whichever version was not yet applied, will be applied before the merge point can be crossed. This brings forth a way of thinking about a merge file, as well as about any Alembic revision file. As they are considered to be "nodes" within a set that is subject to topological sorting, each "node" is a point that cannot be crossed until all of its dependencies are satisfied. Prior to Alembic's support of merge points, the use case of databases sitting on different heads was basically impossible to reconcile; having to manually splice the head files together invariably meant that one migration would occur before the other, thus being incompatible with databases that were present on the other migration. Working with Explicit Branches ------------------------------ The ``alembic upgrade`` command hinted at other options besides merging when dealing with multiple heads. Let's back up and assume we're back where we have as our heads just ``ae1027a6acf`` and ``27c6a30d7c24``:: $ alembic heads 27c6a30d7c24 ae1027a6acf Earlier, when we did ``alembic upgrade head``, it gave us an error which suggested ``please specify a specific target revision, '<branchname>@head' to narrow to a specific head, or 'heads' for all heads`` in order to proceed without merging. Let's cover those cases. Referring to all heads at once ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ The ``heads`` identifier is a lot like ``head``, except it explicitly refers to *all* heads at once. That is, it's like telling Alembic to do the operation for both ``ae1027a6acf`` and ``27c6a30d7c24`` simultaneously. If we started from a fresh database and ran ``upgrade heads`` we'd see:: $ alembic upgrade heads INFO [alembic.migration] Context impl PostgresqlImpl. INFO [alembic.migration] Will assume transactional DDL. INFO [alembic.migration] Running upgrade -> 1975ea83b712, create account table INFO [alembic.migration] Running upgrade 1975ea83b712 -> ae1027a6acf, add a column INFO [alembic.migration] Running upgrade 1975ea83b712 -> 27c6a30d7c24, add shopping cart table Since we've upgraded to ``heads``, and we do in fact have more than one head, that means these two distinct heads are now in our ``alembic_version`` table. We can see this if we run ``alembic current``:: $ alembic current ae1027a6acf (head) 27c6a30d7c24 (head) That means there's two rows in ``alembic_version`` right now. If we downgrade one step at a time, Alembic will **delete** from the ``alembic_version`` table each branch that's closed out, until only one branch remains; then it will continue updating the single value down to the previous versions:: $ alembic downgrade -1 INFO [alembic.migration] Running downgrade ae1027a6acf -> 1975ea83b712, add a column $ alembic current 27c6a30d7c24 (head) $ alembic downgrade -1 INFO [alembic.migration] Running downgrade 27c6a30d7c24 -> 1975ea83b712, add shopping cart table $ alembic current 1975ea83b712 (branchpoint) $ alembic downgrade -1 INFO [alembic.migration] Running downgrade 1975ea83b712 -> , create account table $ alembic current Referring to a Specific Version ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ We can pass a specific version number to ``upgrade``. Alembic will ensure that all revisions upon which this version depends are invoked, and nothing more. So if we ``upgrade`` either to ``27c6a30d7c24`` or ``ae1027a6acf`` specifically, it guarantees that ``1975ea83b712`` will have been applied, but not that any "sibling" versions are applied:: $ alembic upgrade 27c6a INFO [alembic.migration] Running upgrade -> 1975ea83b712, create account table INFO [alembic.migration] Running upgrade 1975ea83b712 -> 27c6a30d7c24, add shopping cart table With ``1975ea83b712`` and ``27c6a30d7c24`` applied, ``ae1027a6acf`` is just a single additional step:: $ alembic upgrade ae102 INFO [alembic.migration] Running upgrade 1975ea83b712 -> ae1027a6acf, add a column Working with Branch Labels ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ To satisfy the use case where an environment has long-lived branches, especially independent branches as will be discussed in the next section, Alembic supports the concept of **branch labels**. These are string values that are present within the migration file, using the new identifier ``branch_labels``. For example, if we want to refer to the "shopping cart" branch using the name "shoppingcart", we can add that name to our file ``27c6a30d7c24_add_shopping_cart_table.py``:: """add shopping cart table """ # revision identifiers, used by Alembic. revision = '27c6a30d7c24' down_revision = '1975ea83b712' branch_labels = ('shoppingcart',) # ... The ``branch_labels`` attribute refers to a string name, or a tuple of names, which will now apply to this revision, all descendants of this revision, as well as all ancestors of this revision up until the preceding branch point, in this case ``1975ea83b712``. We can see the ``shoppingcart`` label applied to this revision:: $ alembic history 1975ea83b712 -> 27c6a30d7c24 (shoppingcart) (head), add shopping cart table 1975ea83b712 -> ae1027a6acf (head), add a column <base> -> 1975ea83b712 (branchpoint), create account table With the label applied, the name ``shoppingcart`` now serves as an alias for the ``27c6a30d7c24`` revision specifically. We can illustrate this by showing it with ``alembic show``:: $ alembic show shoppingcart Rev: 27c6a30d7c24 (head) Parent: 1975ea83b712 Branch names: shoppingcart Path: foo/versions/27c6a30d7c24_add_shopping_cart_table.py add shopping cart table Revision ID: 27c6a30d7c24 Revises: 1975ea83b712 Create Date: 2014-11-20 13:03:11.436407 However, when using branch labels, we usually want to use them using a syntax known as "branch at" syntax; this syntax allows us to state that we want to use a specific revision, let's say a "head" revision, in terms of a *specific* branch. While normally, we can't refer to ``alembic upgrade head`` when there's multiple heads, we *can* refer to this head specifcally using ``shoppingcart@head`` syntax:: $ alembic upgrade shoppingcart@head INFO [alembic.migration] Running upgrade 1975ea83b712 -> 27c6a30d7c24, add shopping cart table The ``shoppingcart@head`` syntax becomes important to us if we wish to add new migration files to our versions directory while maintaining multiple branches. Just like the ``upgrade`` command, if we attempted to add a new revision file to our multiple-heads layout without a specific parent revision, we'd get a familiar error:: $ alembic revision -m "add a shopping cart column" FAILED: Multiple heads are present; please specify the head revision on which the new revision should be based, or perform a merge. The ``alembic revision`` command is pretty clear in what we need to do; to add our new revision specifically to the ``shoppingcart`` branch, we use the ``--head`` argument, either with the specific revision identifier ``27c6a30d7c24``, or more generically using our branchname ``shoppingcart@head``:: $ alembic revision -m "add a shopping cart column" --head shoppingcart@head Generating /path/to/foo/versions/d747a8a8879_add_a_shopping_cart_column.py ... done ``alembic history`` shows both files now part of the ``shoppingcart`` branch:: $ alembic history 1975ea83b712 -> ae1027a6acf (head), add a column 27c6a30d7c24 -> d747a8a8879 (shoppingcart) (head), add a shopping cart column 1975ea83b712 -> 27c6a30d7c24 (shoppingcart), add shopping cart table <base> -> 1975ea83b712 (branchpoint), create account table We can limit our history operation just to this branch as well:: $ alembic history -r shoppingcart: 27c6a30d7c24 -> d747a8a8879 (shoppingcart) (head), add a shopping cart column 1975ea83b712 -> 27c6a30d7c24 (shoppingcart), add shopping cart table If we want to illustrate the path of ``shoppingcart`` all the way from the base, we can do that as follows:: $ alembic history -r :shoppingcart@head 27c6a30d7c24 -> d747a8a8879 (shoppingcart) (head), add a shopping cart column 1975ea83b712 -> 27c6a30d7c24 (shoppingcart), add shopping cart table <base> -> 1975ea83b712 (branchpoint), create account table We can run this operation from the "base" side as well, but we get a different result:: $ alembic history -r shoppingcart@base: 1975ea83b712 -> ae1027a6acf (head), add a column 27c6a30d7c24 -> d747a8a8879 (shoppingcart) (head), add a shopping cart column 1975ea83b712 -> 27c6a30d7c24 (shoppingcart), add shopping cart table <base> -> 1975ea83b712 (branchpoint), create account table When we list from ``shoppingcart@base`` without an endpoint, it's really shorthand for ``-r shoppingcart@base:heads``, e.g. all heads, and since ``shoppingcart@base`` is the same "base" shared by the ``ae1027a6acf`` revision, we get that revision in our listing as well. The ``<branchname>@base`` syntax can be useful when we are dealing with individual bases, as we'll see in the next section. The ``<branchname>@head`` format can also be used with revision numbers instead of branch names, though this is less convenient. If we wanted to add a new revision to our branch that includes the un-labeled ``ae1027a6acf``, if this weren't a head already, we could ask for the "head of the branch that includes ``ae1027a6acf``" as follows:: $ alembic revision -m "add another account column" --head ae10@head Generating /path/to/foo/versions/55af2cb1c267_add_another_account_column.py ... done More Label Syntaxes ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ The ``heads`` symbol can be combined with a branch label, in the case that your labeled branch itself breaks off into multiple branches:: $ alembic upgrade shoppingcart@heads Relative identifiers, as introduced in :ref:`relative_migrations`, work with labels too. For example, upgrading to ``shoppingcart@+2`` means to upgrade from current heads on "shoppingcart" upwards two revisions:: $ alembic upgrade shoppingcart@+2 This kind of thing works from history as well:: $ alembic history -r current:shoppingcart@+2 The newer ``relnum+delta`` format can be combined as well, for example if we wanted to list along ``shoppingcart`` up until two revisions before the head:: $ alembic history -r :shoppingcart@head-2 .. _multiple_bases: Working with Multiple Bases --------------------------- We've seen in the previous section that ``alembic upgrade`` is fine if we have multiple heads, ``alembic revision`` allows us to tell it which "head" we'd like to associate our new revision file with, and branch labels allow us to assign names to branches that we can use in subsequent commands. Let's put all these together and refer to a new "base", that is, a whole new tree of revision files that will be semi-independent of the account/shopping cart revisions we've been working with. This new tree will deal with database tables involving "networking". .. _multiple_version_directories: Setting up Multiple Version Directories ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ While optional, it is often the case that when working with multiple bases, we'd like different sets of version files to exist within their own directories; typically, if an application is organized into several sub-modules, each one would have a version directory containing migrations pertinent to that module. So to start out, we can edit ``alembic.ini`` to refer to multiple directories; we'll also state the current ``versions`` directory as one of them:: # version location specification; this defaults # to foo/versions. When using multiple version # directories, initial revisions must be specified with --version-path version_locations = %(here)s/model/networking %(here)s/alembic/versions The new directory ``%(here)s/model/networking`` is in terms of where the ``alembic.ini`` file is, as we are using the symbol ``%(here)s`` which resolves to this location. When we create our first new revision targeted at this directory, ``model/networking`` will be created automatically if it does not exist yet. Once we've created a revision here, the path is used automatically when generating subsequent revision files that refer to this revision tree. Creating a Labeled Base Revision ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ We also want our new branch to have its own name, and for that we want to apply a branch label to the base. In order to achieve this using the ``alembic revision`` command without editing, we need to ensure our ``script.py.mako`` file, used for generating new revision files, has the appropriate substitutions present. If Alembic version 0.7.0 or greater was used to generate the original migration environment, this is already done. However when working with an older environment, ``script.py.mako`` needs to have this directive added, typically underneath the ``down_revision`` directive:: # revision identifiers, used by Alembic. revision = ${repr(up_revision)} down_revision = ${repr(down_revision)} # add this here in order to use revision with branch_label branch_labels = ${repr(branch_labels)} With this in place, we can create a new revision file, starting up a branch that will deal with database tables involving networking; we specify the ``--head`` version of ``base``, a ``--branch-label`` of ``networking``, and the directory we want this first revision file to be placed in with ``--version-path``:: $ alembic revision -m "create networking branch" --head=base --branch-label=networking --version-path=model/networking Creating directory /path/to/foo/model/networking ... done Generating /path/to/foo/model/networking/3cac04ae8714_create_networking_branch.py ... done If we ran the above command and we didn't have the newer ``script.py.mako`` directive, we'd get this error:: FAILED: Version 3cac04ae8714 specified branch_labels networking, however the migration file foo/model/networking/3cac04ae8714_create_networking_branch.py does not have them; have you upgraded your script.py.mako to include the 'branch_labels' section? When we receive the above error, and we would like to try again, we need to either **delete** the incorrectly generated file in order to run ``revision`` again, *or* we can edit the ``3cac04ae8714_create_networking_branch.py`` directly to add the ``branch_labels`` in of our choosing. Running with Multiple Bases ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Once we have a new, permanent (for as long as we desire it to be) base in our system, we'll always have multiple heads present:: $ alembic heads 3cac04ae8714 (networking) (head) 27c6a30d7c24 (shoppingcart) (head) ae1027a6acf (head) When we want to add a new revision file to ``networking``, we specify ``networking@head`` as the ``--head``. The appropriate version directory is now selected automatically based on the head we choose:: $ alembic revision -m "add ip number table" --head=networking@head Generating /path/to/foo/model/networking/109ec7d132bf_add_ip_number_table.py ... done It's important that we refer to the head using ``networking@head``; if we only refer to ``networking``, that refers to only ``3cac04ae8714`` specifically; if we specify this and it's not a head, ``alembic revision`` will make sure we didn't mean to specify the head:: $ alembic revision -m "add DNS table" --head=networking FAILED: Revision 3cac04ae8714 is not a head revision; please specify --splice to create a new branch from this revision As mentioned earlier, as this base is independent, we can view its history from the base using ``history -r networking@base:``:: $ alembic history -r networking@base: 109ec7d132bf -> 29f859a13ea (networking) (head), add DNS table 3cac04ae8714 -> 109ec7d132bf (networking), add ip number table <base> -> 3cac04ae8714 (networking), create networking branch At the moment, this is the same output we'd get at this point if we used ``-r :networking@head``. However, that will change later on as we use additional directives. We may now run upgrades or downgrades freely, among individual branches (let's assume a clean database again):: $ alembic upgrade networking@head INFO [alembic.migration] Running upgrade -> 3cac04ae8714, create networking branch INFO [alembic.migration] Running upgrade 3cac04ae8714 -> 109ec7d132bf, add ip number table INFO [alembic.migration] Running upgrade 109ec7d132bf -> 29f859a13ea, add DNS table or against the whole thing using ``heads``:: $ alembic upgrade heads INFO [alembic.migration] Running upgrade -> 1975ea83b712, create account table INFO [alembic.migration] Running upgrade 1975ea83b712 -> 27c6a30d7c24, add shopping cart table INFO [alembic.migration] Running upgrade 27c6a30d7c24 -> d747a8a8879, add a shopping cart column INFO [alembic.migration] Running upgrade 1975ea83b712 -> ae1027a6acf, add a column INFO [alembic.migration] Running upgrade ae1027a6acf -> 55af2cb1c267, add another account column Branch Dependencies ------------------- When working with multiple roots, it is expected that these different revision streams will need to refer to one another. For example, a new revision in ``networking`` which needs to refer to the ``account`` table will want to establish ``55af2cb1c267, add another account column``, the last revision that works with the account table, as a dependency. From a graph perspective, this means nothing more that the new file will feature both ``55af2cb1c267, add another account column`` and ``29f859a13ea, add DNS table`` as "down" revisions, and looks just as though we had merged these two branches together. However, we don't want to consider these as "merged"; we want the two revision streams to *remain independent*, even though a version in ``networking`` is going to reach over into the other stream. To support this use case, Alembic provides a directive known as ``depends_on``, which allows a revision file to refer to another as a "dependency", very similar to an entry in ``down_revision`` from a graph perspective, but different from a semantic perspective. To use ``depends_on``, we can specify it as part of our ``alembic revision`` command:: $ alembic revision -m "add ip account table" --head=networking@head --depends-on=55af2cb1c267 Generating /path/to/foo/model/networking/2a95102259be_add_ip_account_table.py ... done Within our migration file, we'll see this new directive present:: # revision identifiers, used by Alembic. revision = '2a95102259be' down_revision = '29f859a13ea' branch_labels = None depends_on='55af2cb1c267' ``depends_on`` may be either a real revision number or a branch name. When specified at the command line, a resolution from a partial revision number will work as well. It can refer to any number of dependent revisions as well; for example, if we were to run the command:: $ alembic revision -m "add ip account table" \\ --head=networking@head \\ --depends-on=55af2cb1c267 --depends-on=d747a --depends-on=fa445 Generating /path/to/foo/model/networking/2a95102259be_add_ip_account_table.py ... done We'd see inside the file:: # revision identifiers, used by Alembic. revision = '2a95102259be' down_revision = '29f859a13ea' branch_labels = None depends_on = ('55af2cb1c267', 'd747a8a8879', 'fa4456a9201') We also can of course add or alter this value within the file manually after it is generated, rather than using the ``--depends-on`` argument. .. versionadded:: 0.8 The ``depends_on`` attribute may be set directly from the ``alembic revision`` command, rather than editing the file directly. ``depends_on`` identifiers may also be specified as branch names at the command line or directly within the migration file. The values may be specified as partial revision numbers from the command line which will be resolved to full revision numbers in the output file. We can see the effect this directive has when we view the history of the ``networking`` branch in terms of "heads", e.g., all the revisions that are descendants:: $ alembic history -r :networking@head 29f859a13ea (55af2cb1c267) -> 2a95102259be (networking) (head), add ip account table 109ec7d132bf -> 29f859a13ea (networking), add DNS table 3cac04ae8714 -> 109ec7d132bf (networking), add ip number table <base> -> 3cac04ae8714 (networking), create networking branch ae1027a6acf -> 55af2cb1c267 (effective head), add another account column 1975ea83b712 -> ae1027a6acf, Add a column <base> -> 1975ea83b712 (branchpoint), create account table What we see is that the full history of the ``networking`` branch, in terms of an "upgrade" to the "head", will include that the tree building up ``55af2cb1c267, add another account column`` will be pulled in first. Interstingly, we don't see this displayed when we display history in the other direction, e.g. from ``networking@base``:: $ alembic history -r networking@base: 29f859a13ea (55af2cb1c267) -> 2a95102259be (networking) (head), add ip account table 109ec7d132bf -> 29f859a13ea (networking), add DNS table 3cac04ae8714 -> 109ec7d132bf (networking), add ip number table <base> -> 3cac04ae8714 (networking), create networking branch The reason for the discrepancy is that displaying history from the base shows us what would occur if we ran a downgrade operation, instead of an upgrade. If we downgraded all the files in ``networking`` using ``networking@base``, the dependencies aren't affected, they're left in place. We also see something odd if we view ``heads`` at the moment:: $ alembic heads 2a95102259be (networking) (head) 27c6a30d7c24 (shoppingcart) (head) 55af2cb1c267 (effective head) The head file that we used as a "dependency", ``55af2cb1c267``, is displayed as an "effective" head, which we can see also in the history display earlier. What this means is that at the moment, if we were to upgrade all versions to the top, the ``55af2cb1c267`` revision number would not actually be present in the ``alembic_version`` table; this is because it does not have a branch of its own subsequent to the ``2a95102259be`` revision which depends on it:: $ alembic upgrade heads INFO [alembic.migration] Running upgrade 29f859a13ea, 55af2cb1c267 -> 2a95102259be, add ip account table $ alembic current 2a95102259be (head) 27c6a30d7c24 (head) The entry is still displayed in ``alembic heads`` because Alembic knows that even though this revision isn't a "real" head, it's still something that we developers consider semantically to be a head, so it's displayed, noting its special status so that we don't get quite as confused when we don't see it within ``alembic current``. If we add a new revision onto ``55af2cb1c267``, the branch again becomes a "real" branch which can have its own entry in the database:: $ alembic revision -m "more account changes" --head=55af2cb@head Generating /path/to/foo/versions/34e094ad6ef1_more_account_changes.py ... done $ alembic upgrade heads INFO [alembic.migration] Running upgrade 55af2cb1c267 -> 34e094ad6ef1, more account changes $ alembic current 2a95102259be (head) 27c6a30d7c24 (head) 34e094ad6ef1 (head) For posterity, the revision tree now looks like:: $ alembic history 29f859a13ea (55af2cb1c267) -> 2a95102259be (networking) (head), add ip account table 109ec7d132bf -> 29f859a13ea (networking), add DNS table 3cac04ae8714 -> 109ec7d132bf (networking), add ip number table <base> -> 3cac04ae8714 (networking), create networking branch 1975ea83b712 -> 27c6a30d7c24 (shoppingcart) (head), add shopping cart table 55af2cb1c267 -> 34e094ad6ef1 (head), more account changes ae1027a6acf -> 55af2cb1c267, add another account column 1975ea83b712 -> ae1027a6acf, Add a column <base> -> 1975ea83b712 (branchpoint), create account table --- 27c6 --> d747 --> <head> / (shoppingcart) <base> --> 1975 --> \ --- ae10 --> 55af --> <head> ^ +--------+ (dependency) | | <base> --> 3782 -----> 109e ----> 29f8 ---> 2a95 --> <head> (networking) If there's any point to be made here, it's if you are too freely branching, merging and labeling, things can get pretty crazy! Hence the branching system should be used carefully and thoughtfully for best results.